Martin County • Jupiter • Tequesta

BEYOND the
BOUNDARY

A community-led initiative examining whether the Martin–Palm Beach County boundary still matches the way residents in this area live, travel, receive services and pay local taxes.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.
The answer is simple.

What is Beyond the Boundary?

SSchools
PParks & Recreation
GGrocery Stores
RRestaurants
RRetail Stores
WCity Water & Sewer
PSPublic Safety
RDRoads & Infrastructure
CChurches
FFriends & Neighbors
STSports Teams
BBoat Ramps
PVProperty Values
LRLocal Representation

Many families and businesses in this part of Martin County routinely travel into Palm Beach County for work, shopping, healthcare, worship, recreation and other everyday needs.

Many residents on the Martin County side of the boundary rely on Palm Beach County for a substantial share of their daily destinations and services.

Does the boundary still make sense today?

A boundary is more than a line.

It determines who makes decisions about your property, where your tax dollars go, which services you receive, and how your community grows.

No higher local tax burden. That is a threshold condition.

Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change unless the public tax analysis shows that affected residents would face no increase in their overall local tax burden. The objective is simple: tax-neutral or lower. Applicable millage rates, taxing districts, special assessments, exemptions and transition provisions should be known and made public before any binding vote.

Taxes

Taxes are the first test.

Beyond the Boundary will not support a boundary change that raises the overall local tax burden on affected residents. Our proposal starts with a simple goal: tax-neutral or lower — and the fire-rescue structure may provide a path to a lower rate.

The non-negotiable condition

No tax increase. Period.

This initiative will not support, in any way, shape, or form, a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. Before any binding vote, the full structure — millage, special districts, non-ad valorem assessments, exemptions and transition provisions — must be documented publicly. The minimum acceptable result is tax-neutral; lower is better.

Beyond the Boundary’s tax proposal

Can this produce lower taxes? That is the goal.

We propose asking Palm Beach County to create or preserve a fire-rescue taxing structure for this area comparable to the 1.7251-mill Jupiter Fire/Rescue rate that PBC actually used in FY2026.

14.4862 millsIllustrative total if the 1.7251 fire-rescue rate were applied to the FY2027 PBC comparison
On $1,000,000 of taxable value: about $14,486.20/year — approximately $968.70 less than Martin County District 3 under the rates used in this comparison.
Proposal / negotiation scenario — not yet approved

The math is straightforward.

Start with the FY2027 PBC unincorporated comparison, remove the regular 3.4581 Fire Rescue MSTU, and substitute the 1.7251 rate PBC used for Jupiter:

16.2192 − 3.4581 + 1.7251 = 14.4862 mills
14.4862 mills$14,486.20 per year on $1,000,000 of taxable value
Martin County District 3: 15.4549 mills / $15,454.90 on $1M taxable value.
This proposal scenario: 14.4862 mills / $14,486.20.
Difference: $968.70 less per year.
Why use 1.7251?

Because Palm Beach County actually charged Jupiter that fire-rescue rate.

For FY2026, Palm Beach County’s adopted Jupiter Fire/Rescue MSTU was 1.7251 mills. The regular PBC Fire Rescue MSTU was 3.4581 mills. The 1.7251 figure is therefore a documented PBC rate that existed for Jupiter — not a number invented for this proposal.

Actual adopted PBC rates • FY2026

Same county. Two fire-rescue millage rates.

These were Palm Beach County’s adopted rates for the regular Fire Rescue MSTU and the separate Jupiter Fire/Rescue MSTU.

Regular PBC Fire Rescue MSTU
3.4581
$3,458.10 on $1M taxable value
Jupiter Fire/Rescue MSTU
1.7251
$1,725.10 on $1M taxable value
$1,733.00Difference in annual fire-rescue millage on $1,000,000 of taxable value.

Important: Palm Beach County has not agreed to apply 1.7251 mills to this boundary area. This is the structure Beyond the Boundary proposes exploring. Any final plan must be documented publicly and must be tax-neutral or lower before this initiative will support it.

FY2027 • standard-rate context

What happens without the proposed fire-rescue structure?

This is why the fire-rescue proposal matters. Under the standard FY2027 structures used in this analysis, Palm Beach County is currently higher than Martin County. Beyond the Boundary is not proposing that residents simply accept that higher standard rate.

The example below uses a $1,000,000 taxable value. One mill equals $1 of tax for every $1,000 of taxable value, so at $1 million taxable value each 1.0000 mill equals $1,000 per year.

Martin County • District 3

15.4549 mills
$15,454.90 / year
FY2027 final comparison rate used for the Martin County District 3 area.

Palm Beach County • Standard unincorporated structure

16.2192 mills
$16,219.20 / year
FY2027 comparable base unincorporated rate used in this analysis before substituting the proposed lower fire-rescue rate.
$764.30 higherUnder the standard FY2027 structures shown above, PBC is 0.7643 mills higher on $1,000,000 of taxable value. That is not the structure this initiative is asking residents to accept.
Six-year view

FY2022 through FY2027

Rates move from year to year. The table shows the comparable total millage used for this analysis rather than relying on a single snapshot. “Difference” is PBC minus Martin; a negative number means the PBC figure was lower that year.

Fiscal yearMartin D3PBC unincorp.DifferenceDifference on $1M
FY202217.299017.3690+0.0700+$70.00
FY202316.621616.8381+0.2165+$216.50
FY202416.656516.4196−0.2369−$236.90
FY202516.400816.2764−0.1244−$124.40
FY202615.754916.2652+0.5103+$510.30
FY202715.454916.2192+0.7643+$764.30

About the year labels: Florida property-tax rolls and local-government fiscal years overlap. This page uses the fiscal year label for consistency with county budget documents. The comparison is intended to show the tax structure applicable to the relevant unincorporated areas, not to estimate a particular parcel’s bill.

What the comparison does — and does not — mean

The final number has to include everything.

Taxable value ≠ market value

The $1 million example assumes $1,000,000 of taxable value after the applicable assessment rules and exemptions. It is not a $1 million sale-price example.

Special districts matter

The 16.2192 PBC figure is the comparable unincorporated base used here. Geography-specific districts can change a parcel’s total. For example, the Jupiter Inlet District can add a separate millage where applicable.

Millage is not the whole bill

Non-ad valorem assessments are not captured by a simple millage comparison. Any real proposal must identify and compare those charges too.

No decision based on a promise

The initiative’s condition is based on the documented final structure, not an estimate or verbal assurance. If the final overall local burden is higher, the initiative will not support the boundary change.

Bottom line

Tax-neutral or lower — or no support.

Taxes are the first gate, not an afterthought. Any boundary proposal must show residents the complete math before a binding vote. If the documented final result increases the overall local tax burden, Beyond the Boundary will not support it.

Official sources

The figures above are compiled from county budget documents and property-appraiser tax-roll materials. Rates should be rechecked against the final taxing-district assignments before any formal boundary action.

The Issue

Does the current boundary still match the community?

The Martin County boundary was drawn decades ago, long before the community we know today existed. Today, many residents cross that line for everyday services, work, school, healthcare, shopping and recreation.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.

The Question

The initiative focuses on how the current boundary affects residents, businesses, service access, planning and future growth.

Communities divided

The county line separates nearby neighborhoods whose daily travel and service patterns often cross it.

Dependency on Palm Beach County

Many people on the Martin County side rely on Palm Beach County for work, play, shopping, healthcare, and more.

Tax dollars and local service use do not always align

Property taxes are paid into Martin County and other taxing districts, while many day-to-day destinations and services used by residents are located to the south in Palm Beach County.

Nearby services across the line

Residents often cross the county line to reach nearby schools, healthcare, shopping, recreation and other services.

Planning across the line

The initiative argues that the current boundary complicates planning for growth, investment, and local services.

By the Numbers

Approx. 3,400 homes

Are located in the Martin County communities north of the Loxahatchee River within the area being discussed.

Daily connections

Residents drive into Palm Beach County for work, school, healthcare, shopping, dining, recreation, and nearly everything in between.

Approx. $2.6 billion in taxable value

Those funds enter the countywide tax base. Any boundary proposal would need a public comparison of taxes, assessments and services before a formal vote occurs. This initiative will not support a final proposal that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents; the objective is tax-neutral or lower.

One community

A shared river, shared interests, and a shared future—divided by a line.

The decision should come after the facts

Beyond the Boundary is asking residents and public officials to examine whether the current county line still matches the way this community functions today. Any final proposal should be evaluated on taxes, services, geography, legal requirements and resident input. A no-increase tax result is a condition of this initiative’s support.

The Map

Real communities. A boundary concept for discussion.

Explore the current county line, a rough discussion concept for a possible adjusted boundary, and nearby community connections. The gold line is not a final proposal.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.
THIS MAP IS A VERY ROUGH SKETCH — NOT A FINAL BOUNDARY.

Neighborhoods may be included or excluded as the discussion develops. The intent is not to split an HOA or established neighborhood between two counties. Any final boundary would require resident input, legal and intergovernmental review, and the applicable public process.

Beyond the Boundary proposed boundary map

Interactive map unavailable. Showing the project map instead.

Loading map…

Use Layers and Compare for optional information. Each panel can be closed with ×; only one panel opens at a time on smaller screens.

What the map shows

The blue dashed line marks the current Martin–Palm Beach County boundary. The gold line is a rough discussion sketch showing one possible way to group residential communities north of the current line while leaving the Tanah Keeta Scout Reservation in Martin County and generally following the south side of Jonathan Dickinson State Park. It is expected to change as neighborhood input, tax analysis, service questions and legal requirements are evaluated.

Map source: Current county-boundary geometry is requested from Martin County’s public GIS service. The gold proposed line is a project concept for public discussion, not an adopted government boundary.
HOA Communities

A simple way to hear from your residents

HOAs and neighborhood associations can help document what residents actually think—without committing the community to a final boundary that does not yet exist.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.

No HOA is being asked to endorse a final map.

There is no final map. The purpose of this toolkit is to make resident input easy to collect, transparent to report, and useful to public officials if the association chooses to share it.

A clean four-step process

1 · Share the same information

Send residents the website link, explain that the map is only a rough concept, and make clear that the initiative’s tax condition is tax-neutral or lower.

2 · Ask a short resident poll

Use the neutral survey below or adapt it to your association’s normal voting platform. Give residents a support, oppose and undecided option.

3 · Publish the totals

Report how many households were invited, how many responded, and the exact count for each answer. Separate resident results from any later board position.

4 · Decide what to do with the result

The board can simply keep the results, send them to this initiative, or provide them to relevant public officials. The survey itself does not bind the HOA to any future proposal.

Copy • email • post • print

Suggested resident survey

This is intentionally short and balanced. An HOA can add its own deadline and voting instructions.

[COMMUNITY NAME] — Resident Boundary Study Survey

Background: Beyond the Boundary is an independent community initiative examining whether the Martin–Palm Beach County boundary should be reconsidered for residential communities north of the Loxahatchee River. The map at BeyondTheBoundaryMC.org is a rough discussion sketch only; no final boundary has been proposed. The initiative states that it will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. Its stated objective is tax-neutral or lower.

1. Which best reflects your view at this time?
2. Should our HOA participate in future discussions so residents’ views are represented?
3. Which issues matter most to your household? (Check all that apply.)

This is an informal HOA resident survey, not a government referendum. Report results with the number of households invited, total responses, survey dates and exact totals for each answer.

How to report an HOA poll

If your association chooses to share its result, send the community name, survey dates, number of households invited, total responses, and the exact count for each answer. If the board later adopts its own position, report that separately from the resident poll.

Recommended result format Households invited: ___ Total responses: ___ Support continued study: ___ Prefer to remain / oppose continued study: ___ Undecided / need more information: ___ Board position, if any: __________________
Who’s Behind This?

THE COMMUNITY.

Beyond the Boundary is intended to be a community-led discussion—not a claim that every resident already agrees. Support, opposition, questions, corrections and better ideas are all welcome.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.

This should be bigger than one person

The website may have started with one resident asking questions, but a county-boundary discussion should be judged on public facts and community input. Residents, HOAs, businesses, local organizations and public officials should all be able to examine the same information and say where they agree or disagree.

Residents first

No neighborhood should be treated as a line on a map. The views of the people who live there should be documented before any final proposal is advanced.

Disagreement is welcome

This site welcomes people who support the idea, oppose it, or simply want better answers about taxes, services and legal process.

No final boundary yet

The gold map is deliberately rough. Neighborhoods may be included or excluded, and the intent is not to split an HOA or established neighborhood.

Tax-neutral or lower

The initiative will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax numbers must be public before any binding vote.

Transparency

Who built the website? Cory Beaton.

Cory Beaton created this website after a long-running dispute with Martin County over his family’s attempt to build a single-family home on property along the Loxahatchee River. The dispute has involved the County’s application of minimum-lot-size rules, the treatment of privately owned submerged land, administrative review, and multiple County Commission proceedings.

That experience prompted a broader question: Why is this area in Martin County in the first place? For many residents in the communities north of the Loxahatchee River, daily life often points south toward Jupiter and Tequesta for shopping, healthcare, recreation, utilities, employment and other services. The question became whether the county boundary still matches those present-day connections.

The property dispute was the catalyst—not the case for a boundary change.

The broader boundary question should stand or fall on taxes, services, geography, legal requirements, and what residents actually want. Cory’s individual property dispute remains separate from that analysis.

Make the community record stronger

If something on this site is incomplete or wrong, say so. If your neighborhood has a different view, share it. If your HOA conducts a resident poll, report the results exactly as they came in. A credible public discussion should be able to show both support and opposition.

The History

The land before the line

The boundary was drawn in 1925—before the world around it changed. Over the next quarter century, this area followed very different paths north and south of the line.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.

A timeline of change

Before 1925

Private land

Before Camp Murphy, the land that later became Jonathan Dickinson State Park was privately owned by multiple landowners and companies.

1925

County boundary is drawn

Martin County is created by the Legislature from portions of Palm Beach and St. Lucie counties. At the time, this area was sparsely developed and the boundary reflected the communities and transportation network of that era.

1942

Camp Murphy is built

The U.S. Army transforms the landscape into a massive secret radar-training installation.

  • 1,000+ buildings
  • 6,000+ personnel
  • Power plants, sewer system, church, theater and more
1944

The camp closes

After only two years, Camp Murphy is deactivated. The future of this enormous tract is suddenly wide open.

1946

What should this land become?

Florida considers converting part of the former military installation into a tuberculosis sanatorium. The proposal does not move forward, and surplus Camp Murphy property and equipment are disposed of after the war.

1947

Florida buys Camp Murphy

By 1947, Florida had acquired roughly 7,900 acres of former Camp Murphy property for a state park and related public purposes.

1950

Jonathan Dickinson State Park opens

The property opens as a state park and is later renamed Jonathan Dickinson State Park.

1953

Another vision

“Holy Land U.S.A.,” a Christian-themed attraction, is proposed on park land. It does not happen.

Today

The land changed. The community changed. The line didn’t.

Many daily trips and community connections run south toward Jupiter and Tequesta while the county boundary remains in place.

Two paths. Opposite directions.

North of our community

Thousands of acres become Jonathan Dickinson State Park.

  • 1942 — Camp Murphy
  • 1947 — State acquisition
  • 1950 — State park established
  • About 10,500 acres in today’s state park

South of our community

Jupiter and Tequesta grow into vibrant communities.

  • 1926 — U.S. 1 bridge crosses the Loxahatchee
  • 1955 — Tequesta development begins
  • 1957 — Tequesta incorporates
  • 1959 — Jupiter Inlet Colony forms

Why does Martin County exist?

In 1925, residents around Stuart felt Palm Beach County government was not adequately serving their community. They believed too little road investment was reaching them. They petitioned the Legislature, and Martin County was created.

The boundary then. The question now.

When Martin County was created in 1925, north-south road and railroad connections linked this area to Hobe Sound and Stuart. Today, the 10,500-acre Jonathan Dickinson State Park occupies a large area immediately north of the communities discussed here.

The Record

Sources, maps and public information

This page identifies the public sources used for core historical and map information and separates official records from the project’s proposed boundary concept.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.

Primary sources

Martin County

Martin County states that it was established by an act of the Florida Legislature in 1925.

Martin County — About Martin County ↗City of Stuart — Historic Survey (county-creation context) ↗

Jonathan Dickinson State Park

Florida State Parks documents Camp Murphy, more than 1,000 buildings, more than 6,000 personnel, deactivation in 1944 and the park’s establishment in 1950.

Florida State Parks — History ↗

Tequesta

The Village of Tequesta’s historical summary records its incorporation on June 4, 1957.

Village of Tequesta — History ↗

Fire-rescue transition

The Town of Jupiter states that Jupiter Fire Rescue begins service October 1, 2026. Palm Beach County materials document the corresponding end of County service inside the Town.

Town of Jupiter — Fire Rescue ↗Palm Beach County Fire Rescue — Stations ↗

Current county line

The interactive map requests current Martin County boundary geometry from the County’s public ArcGIS service.

Martin County GIS boundary service ↗

Project figures & methodology

Figures describing the discussion area, taxable value, travel patterns or service use are project estimates unless an official source is linked. They should be updated when newer public records become available. The gold boundary on this site is a rough discussion sketch, not a final proposal, and it has not been adopted by Martin County, Palm Beach County or the State of Florida. Neighborhoods may be included or excluded as the concept is evaluated, with the stated intent not to split an HOA or established neighborhood.

Corrections are welcome

If you find an error, a newer government record, or a source that points in a different direction, send it to BeyondTheBoundaryMC@gmail.com.

FAQ

Questions about the boundary

Short answers to the questions residents are most likely to ask.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.
Is this a government website?

No. Beyond the Boundary is an independent community initiative. It is not an adopted plan of Martin County, Palm Beach County or the State of Florida.

What is Beyond the Boundary?

It is a community-led initiative examining whether the Martin–Palm Beach County boundary still matches the way residential communities north of the Loxahatchee River live, travel, receive services and pay local taxes.

Is the gold line on the map the final proposed boundary?

No. It is a very rough discussion sketch. Neighborhoods may be included or excluded as the concept is evaluated. The stated intent is not to split an HOA or established neighborhood between two counties. Any final boundary would require resident input, legal and intergovernmental review, and the applicable public process.

What area is being discussed?

The current concept focuses on residential communities immediately north of the existing county line and south of Jonathan Dickinson State Park. The rough project map keeps the Tanah Keeta Scout Reservation in Martin County, but the exact residential boundary is open to refinement.

Would taxes change?

They could, depending on the final boundary terms and the taxing districts that would apply. Beyond the Boundary’s stated condition is that it will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The objective is tax-neutral or lower. Before any binding vote or action, the applicable millage rates, taxing districts, special assessments, exemptions and transition provisions should be established, compared and made public.

Who is behind this?

The website was created by Cory Beaton and is intended to support a broader community-led discussion. The initiative does not claim that every resident agrees. Support, opposition, corrections and questions are welcome. See the “Who’s Behind This?” page for the origin of the project.

How can an HOA or neighborhood participate?

The HOA Communities page provides a short resident survey and a transparent way to report results. Associations can use it simply to measure resident opinion; conducting a poll does not require the board to endorse a final boundary proposal.

Would schools and services change automatically?

No. School assignment, fire-rescue, utilities, roads and other services are governed by separate public agencies and would have to be addressed through the applicable legal and intergovernmental process.

What happens to Jonathan Dickinson State Park?

The boundary concept shown on this site leaves Jonathan Dickinson State Park in Martin County. The discussion is focused on developed residential communities south of the park.

How can I send a correction or comment?

Use the Get Involved page or email BeyondTheBoundaryMC@gmail.com. Feedback supporting, opposing or correcting information on the site is welcome.

Get Involved

Share your perspective

Questions, comments, corrections, historical information, or a different point of view are welcome.

TAXPAYER CONDITION: TAX-NEUTRAL OR LOWER. Beyond the Boundary will not support a final boundary change that increases the overall local tax burden on affected residents. The tax and assessment structure must be documented publicly before any binding vote or action.

Contact Beyond the Boundary

Email the project directly from your phone. The message will open in your normal mail app.

BeyondTheBoundaryMC@gmail.com

What to send

You can send questions about the map, historical documents, service information, corrections, or your own perspective on the county boundary. If you live in the affected area, you can also describe which schools, parks, businesses, healthcare providers, utilities, and public services your household uses most often.

HOA or neighborhood leader?

Use the HOA Communities page to share a neutral resident poll, document the result and keep any board position separate from resident vote totals.

Open the HOA Toolkit